 |  |   | 6 ostatnio dodanych z 6 wszystkich:
| plQaiWIDT | Diane (Steven\'s Mum) - These photos are geogrous! I have looked at them so many times! The expression in Steven\'s eyes where he is adjusting his cravatt makes my heart melt! You captured my little boy in that one!Can\'t wait to see more! Well done to both of you! | | CDPwUFDnbTXaEpavGqw | Since our Fathers\' day, we have been playing \"Cyber\" bsaabell. I bought my husband a WII console, and playing bsaabell brought me back to when I was in school.That strawberry scone looks so real, I wanted to comment, I love how generous the baker is with the strawberry. | | KXZXRsfSmRJPEbJ | Iâm impressed, I need to say. Really not often do I eontuncer a blog thatâs each educative and entertaining, and let me let you know, you\'ve gotten hit the nail on the head. Your thought is excellent; the issue is something that not enough individuals are talking intelligently about. I am very completely happy that I stumbled across this in my search for one thing regarding this. | | CwuCrFruTEgFXG | Erich, by overhead I meant asotnidiratimn PLUS fundraising, just as you did. Interplast\'s reported # appears to be only asotnidiratimn. Charity Navigator puts asotnidiratimn at 10% as Interplast does, but the combined ratio at 25% ().Yes, 25% is less than 37% - I\'m guessing the diff is that Interplast allocates some of the executive salaries and other central overhead to program - but you\'re right, I don\'t delve deeper. That\'s because there are 100 different ways to calculate the ratio, none of which has anything to do with the fact that Interplast performs life-changing cleft lip and palate operations for a quite reasonable amount of money, in contrast to other charities running huge varities of questionable, undocumented, untested programs.You haven\'t addressed any of the substantial arguments I made - none of which depend AT ALL on the details of how the ratio is calculated - choosing instead to nitpick the most narrow, offhand one I tossed out. This seems consistent with my earlier guess about where you are coming from. | | fZNVtjIbmE | continued . I have my AR5 that I built in 2008 and I have no problems tniakg it out to the range and I really don\'t give a **** abut what cops say; their opinions and the DOJ\'s opinion doesn\'t matter. The law is the law.My bullet button is welded in place and it is PERFECTLY LEGAL. Arsenal does NOT need approval from the DOj unless they are shipping the rifles into California in their original unaltered configuration; of which they are NOT doing.Thank you Arsenal!!! | | VCqnTIayDcCxRBq | It\'s good to see they have finally come nruoad and decided to help us Californians out BUT I\'m bummed about that proprietary lock. I know they are just doing what their lawyers advised them to do but any Californian who already owns high cap mags won\'t be able to legally use them in this rifle.Also, there is potential for high cap mags being legally sold in CA somewhat soon. Unfortuantely, this possible proliferation of high caps won\'t matter to anyone with this rifle. |
DODAJ KOMENTARZ
|
 |  |
|
|
|
|
|
